![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
About the scabbard. Somehow it doesn't feel Mendalam to me, but upper Mahakam. This besides of the carving, also because of the ratan knots that holds the two slabs of wood together. When you look at Mendalam scabbards the ratan often are worked out of site beneath the upper slab of wood, instead of ratan knots which cover the upper wooden slab of the scabbard... I'm not sure about the age of your mandau. It could be early 1900's and might be early collected? Quote:
![]() The points I carried out makes me think it's not Mahakam, but again it could be an erroneous answer from a Borneo/mandau scholar... ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Goregeous mandau. I love the simplicity combined with nice scabbard carving and wooden "knot".
I am even more fascinated with the distinctions in classification that to more of a novice with mandaus will look 'minor'. Perhaps a thread should be started illustrating mandau hilt types and their unique distinctions??!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,214
|
![]() Quote:
What a great notion! ![]() ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|