![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Posts: 32
|
![]()
thanks Jim, I checked out the Wagner book Hieb- und Stichwaffen, and you are right. Meanwhile I found informations in some osprey books, but about the pallash blade, maybe it is not a pallash, because the blade is too short for a pallash and the Blutrinne seem short to fit the blade.So chances are to be a blade ment for business as a yat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,595
|
![]()
Good call Sergiu, it very well might be a shorter heavy type blade used for the hanger type weapons used by auxiliary forces such as sappers, miners and also by artillery gunners. The yataghan term is of course often misapplied in the description of some weapons, and of course used with reference to the bifurcated or eared pommel hilt rather than the weapon overall. I wish I had some of the reference books on Austro-Hungarian and Polish swords with me here in the bookmobile
![]() Its definitely a handsome sword in any case and maybe somebody out there might have more info. All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|