![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
|
Quote:
I was also under the impression that the three-section daggers/katars were more fragile? I also thought that there were forms/techniques for using the long blade to tie-up or get past the opponent's main weapon and using the katar to finish them. However, I'm sure there were many many different styles and preferences as far as shield, katar, or both in same hand, left-handed dagger, dual tulwars, single tulwar, etc. Might be time to do more research and learn even more
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
Here's a suggestion for the use of shields.
They're much better than swords at blocking arrows. Once decent muskets came along, effective shields became unmanageably heavy, as did armor. Lugging a flintlock and a shield for hand-to-hand combat is a bit awkward, and I'm willing to bet that this is when shields were largely discarded. F |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|