Authenticity ID help - Chinese dao

Jim McDougall · 16th October 2011, 06:09 PM

Authenticity? well its a dao OK. In my opinion, I think extremely low mileage !
I had one that looked much like this once many years ago, acquired from a much fabled dealer of questionable character....had the same wire wrapped covering on the scabbard.Didnt keep it long. Sometimes we get lucky

Henk · 16th October 2011, 07:12 PM

Lucky you. Now somebody else has a headache

Although I'm not an expert on these things I see clearly the small problems.

Gavin Nugent · 16th October 2011, 11:34 PM

A nice clean old piece. I would suggest age as 1890-1930.
With regards to the scabbard tip, lets face it many who have these things don't know the first this about the ups and downs and lefts and rights...simply put on the wrong way as the 'glue' likely dried out and it fell off...I was emailed images of a very nice late Mamluk sabre and the throat fitting was upside down...don't know how they got the blade in but these things happen....I wouldn't let the blade brightness be a concern either, these things were made this way...it might even be in original polish in which case you'll see an inserted edge once in hand.

KuKulzA28 · 16th October 2011, 11:41 PM

If it is a good piece, then I really missed out.
And in that case, somebody definitely benefited from my bargaining.

ariel · 17th October 2011, 02:42 AM

No good deed goes unpunished.

josh stout · 22nd October 2011, 02:43 AM

I have been wondering about these wire wrapped swords for a while. I think they are Republican pieces, though some may be very late Qing. What I am wondering about is the blade. I own a jian with a wire wrapped scabbard that appears about as modern as an antique can be. In some ways this is good. It is in good condition with a spotless blade in its original polish, but there are some things that can be less attractive about later Chinese swords. In particular, the blade on the jian I own appears to be mono-steel, and there is a nut on the pommel. I am not completely sure about the steel because I haven't wanted to etch the blade in case it is nickel-plated. Still it rings when you draw it in a way that none of my sanmei blades do.

So I would guess that the one you missed was of roughly the same era and quality as my jian. It may well have had a nickel-plated mono-steel blade of good quality, but not as nice as Qing inserted edge pieces. There is another possibility; apparently there was also a weird transition period where they were nickel-plating pattern welded blades. Unfortunately you can’t find out without ruining the plating.

Josh

BerberDagger · 22nd October 2011, 03:09 AM

in my opinion a boxer period dao

16th October 2011, 11:34 PM	#3
Gavin Nugent Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,818	Nice clean piece A nice clean old piece. I would suggest age as 1890-1930. With regards to the scabbard tip, lets face it many who have these things don't know the first this about the ups and downs and lefts and rights...simply put on the wrong way as the 'glue' likely dried out and it fell off...I was emailed images of a very nice late Mamluk sabre and the throat fitting was upside down...don't know how they got the blade in but these things happen....I wouldn't let the blade brightness be a concern either, these things were made this way...it might even be in original polish in which case you'll see an inserted edge once in hand.

16th October 2011, 06:09 PM	#1
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,459	Authenticity? well its a dao OK. In my opinion, I think extremely low mileage ! I had one that looked much like this once many years ago, acquired from a much fabled dealer of questionable character....had the same wire wrapped covering on the scabbard.Didnt keep it long. Sometimes we get lucky

16th October 2011, 07:12 PM	#2
Henk Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,209	Lucky you. Now somebody else has a headache Although I'm not an expert on these things I see clearly the small problems.

16th October 2011, 11:41 PM	#4
KuKulzA28 Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: between work and sleep Posts: 731	If it is a good piece, then I really missed out. And in that case, somebody definitely benefited from my bargaining.

17th October 2011, 02:42 AM	#5
ariel Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 5,503	No good deed goes unpunished.

22nd October 2011, 02:43 AM	#6
josh stout Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 407	I have been wondering about these wire wrapped swords for a while. I think they are Republican pieces, though some may be very late Qing. What I am wondering about is the blade. I own a jian with a wire wrapped scabbard that appears about as modern as an antique can be. In some ways this is good. It is in good condition with a spotless blade in its original polish, but there are some things that can be less attractive about later Chinese swords. In particular, the blade on the jian I own appears to be mono-steel, and there is a nut on the pommel. I am not completely sure about the steel because I haven't wanted to etch the blade in case it is nickel-plated. Still it rings when you draw it in a way that none of my sanmei blades do. So I would guess that the one you missed was of roughly the same era and quality as my jian. It may well have had a nickel-plated mono-steel blade of good quality, but not as nice as Qing inserted edge pieces. There is another possibility; apparently there was also a weird transition period where they were nickel-plating pattern welded blades. Unfortunately you can’t find out without ruining the plating. Josh

22nd October 2011, 03:09 AM	#7
BerberDagger Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 247	in my opinion a boxer period dao