![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
It has the folding part of the guard that I'm told was apparently discontinued in 1854. So I'm told that this example dates to 1845-1854. I've found some info on the retailer, I'm really hoping to find something on the spine stamp. I believe that the portepee/sword knot is original, it certainly came to me with it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]()
I am not familiar with this retailer, however I wanted to note that in about this time period, another instance of numbers stamped on the blade spine. I have a Reeves M1821 light cavalry sabre stamped with Reeves name and the number 111 in bold numbers. It has been some time since I have seen the sword, but these stamps are in the usual location near the forte on blade spine. I always thought this might be unit numbers perhaps for contract for specific number of swords. As the M1821 had a lag in production from 1821 to 1829 I thought perhaps this one might have been an interim run production. I cannot recall details on that research but seemed worthy of note. I have not seen other makers adding numbers to thier name stamp, nor for that matter numbered blades (other obviously than Wilkinson who applied this practice later in around late 1850s? and onky on officers swords).
Reeves was a high profile and innovative maker who produced the patent tang used on the M1853 cavalry sabre, the first that universally was designed for both light and heavy cavalry in English swords. Im not sure how this might apply to the number here, but as always look forward to other views and suggestions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Hi mate, I was wondering if the number on the spine in this case was just an inventory number for the retailers records. I was hoping that somewhere these records might still exist and have coresponding names of buyers attached..... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]() Quote:
clearly the number has some record oriented purpose, but I dont think retailers would have done so.....as mentioned, Wilkinson is the only maker I am aware of who numbered and recorded sales to officers. I think they still have records on file and Robert Wilkinson has access to files. I think he is likely the best source to find out about this retailer and more detail, unfortunately he is on another forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Sorry, I hadn't thought of that. What a good idea! I just hate when there are undeciphered numbers like this. I've posted it... where Robert frequents, hopfully he can help. I've oiled the blade in readiness to clean the tiny amount of rust-dust thats formed. Sadly some plank has managed to get brasso in the ray-skin, getting that off is going to be.... 'fun'. Best Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]() Quote:
![]() my advice, clean using a soft toothbrush with some soapy water (washing up liquid) , do not over wet, dry/dab with kitchen paper. Re-do as necessary..rinse with clean water...once completely clean and dry, apply some olive oil to re-vitalise the ray-skin. All the best David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the tips, is olive oil the recommended 'food' for this stuff then? Best Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|