![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
![]()
Hi Josh,
Interesting blade. Can you post dimensions, please? Regards, Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 27
|
![]()
It is a Japanese ken. Fitting of late Edo or early Meiji period.
Nice one! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]()
Interesting sword Josh! Definitely Japanese design motifs...the Tokugawa mon...the deep engraving & style on the blade reminds me more of things you see on some Japanese blades...what an interesting piece! Looking forward to see what others think! Thanks for sharing!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
I am not sure what it is, but it is certainly trying to look Japanese. I found something similar here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...253D&viewitem= The Tokugawa mon is actually what made me think it was Chinese. I thought such a mon would be restricted to clan members within Japan but would be something that a Chinese copier might pick as a showy motif. Also the mon forms two sides of the metal peg that holds the tang in place and there is no way that I can figure out to disassemble the sword in the Japanese manner. The only way to disassemble the blade would be to destroy the emblem. Would someone Japanese make a sword that way? I think I can leave out the Korean possibility because the style is too perfectly Japanese, but I still wonder if it was not made in China for export. I do agree that the engraving is much deeper than that found on Chinese blades, and what appears to be the hamon is very straight and even, something I have never seen on a Chinese blade. Either way, I am very happy with it because it is beautiful and I got it for a Chinese sword price ![]() Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|