![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
|
![]()
I too have never seen another one like it, where it is the shape of the typical pommel (Makara?) but without the carvings... so because of that and because it has my favorite Indonesian pedang blade shape (I call "Katana-tip"), I had to get it. Rick, would you mind explaining to me why the uncarved is so special? To me, it would seem like carved takes more work than uncarved, so if uncarved was better, wouldn't you see more of those??
Yea, novice questions ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
|
![]()
I can't explain, I can guess; these 'natural' forms that mimic hilt pommels and keris handles come from the 'natural' world not from the hand of man .
That makes them special . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
|
![]()
Perhaps, though the resemblance is too much - I think someone simply shaped buffalo horn into the look of the typical pommel and then did not proceed to make the traditional carvings, but I don't know for sure.
These blades were definitely big in Lombok from the little I've read, and apparently found in central/south Sumatra... I wonder what factors prompted their being readily adopted in Sumatra?? ...versus Borneo and Java which seem to have had their own endemic parangs and pedangs already well-established. I could be wrong about my assumptions however, I am pretty new to Indonesian weapons. Sumatran weapons are the most fascinating to me, but there seems to be the least information on them... aside from the occasional Batak place, piso podang, or Acehnese collection... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|