![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,230
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Well David, only if the triangle was the custom on this particular piece. Since I don't know (it could be earlier) then I won't do anything more. I usually don't like to do more than I would have proof.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Also I forgot to mention that this was brought back by Captain George A. Campbell of Woburn, Massachusetts who fought in the Philippine-American War.
Glad to have at least some of the provenance. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]() Quote:
i see what david is saying, since i kinda took your statement he posted the same way. regarding the custom of adding a triangle, etc on pieces: i could be wrong but, it was in my opinion that these symbols weren't added on these knives, swords, etc. because it's a must nor the custom, but rather it's more of a whim by the original owner. kinda like their personal signature, hence the reason why they are rare? reminded me of a story about someone who added a sharpened back edge on a regular barung because he thought it was neat, or perhaps to enhance the value? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Well again if there were evidence that it was supposed to be there, then I might add it, otherwise I just leave it alone - want to be conservative about these things - don't want to add something that might not have been there. There is restoration and then there is fantasy..........
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,277
|
![]()
Hello Jose,
you have done well that you don't add the triangle. Agree complete with you! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 32
|
![]()
very nice...erich
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 417
|
![]()
For comparison. I bought this about 4 years ago. 14 inches in overall length. Diamond cross-section blade is 9 1/2 inches long with a brass overlay at the ricasso. Brass guard, ferrules, and end cap. The dark hilt is turned kamagong or carabao horn and inlaid with twisted brass wire. The scabbard is leather, in fine condition, with silver mounts.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I had a nearly identical one to this years ago but sold it............hmmm............
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
Could these daggers I have also be Bicolano? Compare the blade styles to this one off eBay (it is from Sorsogon, Bicol - southern tip of Luzon):
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]() Quote:
Robert |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
No Robert I did not get this and was just wondering since the blades were similar. I tend to move away from the Bicol attribution for the Tejeros Convention dagger (bottom of picture of the 2). Still don't know, but was just wondering.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|