![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]()
Very beautiful piece! I was wondering who got this one too!! Great to see the Photos!!! Thanks for sharing!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]()
Charles can snap a close up of the makers mark of the blade!?!?!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
CONGRADULATIONS THAT IS A BEAUTY.
![]() THE SCABBARD IS UNUSUAL AND DIFFERENT FROM ANY I HAVE SEEN BEFORE. THE CARVED IVORY IS QUITE A BIT DIFFERENT FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN ON MOST BURMESE AND THAI SWORDS OR CARVINGS. THE FACES ARE CARVED TO LOOK ALMOST TIKI LIKE NOT LIKE BEAUTIFUL HUMAN FACES AS USUAL. OF COURSE IT MAY NOT REPRESENT A HUMAN BUT A MONKEY GOD OR SOMETHING. PERHAPS THE DESIGNS ON THE SCABBARD AND THE CARVEING STYLE WILL SHED MORE LIGHT ON ITS ORIGINS. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Well I am sure that these faces are not of Hanuman. However, who can they be?
I may post (after I take close ups) my ivory hilted dha to show similar figures carved in "tiki" form, but these are all Hanumans. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]() Quote:
And that the more superficial carving was more Northern style of Shan? This was a good discussion regarding ivory carving styles: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=burmese+ivory |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Nathaniel; 16th January 2011 at 08:23 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
Here are pictures of my dha with similar carvings (but of Hanuman figures) in ivory from the Shan (according to Mark Bowditch) for comparison and explanation of what I talked about earlier (Pictures from the Macao exhibit and Mark Bowditch).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|