![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
|
![]()
Hi Glen and Mark,
Is it Post #13 that you prove how out of date the 1992 Bazelon article is? Unfortunately I am a two finger typist and do not have time to type the article, and I have no way of getting the article to you. I will quote Bazelon's acknowledge of these concerns using the same sources as you. His conclusion is that Rose and Prahl are not the sources for these brass hilts but builds a pretty convincing argument for a cottage industry in the Philly area as the source. I will have to leave it to you to find the article and see how he comes to a that conclusion as that is what the entire article is about. If it is something else in Glens posts that I have missed that show how "out of date" the article is please let me know as I will see if it is addressed. '...These factors lead to the conclusion that the brass hilts were made by another party working in cooperation with Rose and Prahl' The reason I bring this up again is that the Bazelon article is the most up to date and thorough discussion on these strange brass hilted swords (that I am aware of). I will happily discard it when some thing better comes along. It also is helping me find an answer to my mystery saber which I won't post here so as not to distract the thread. I think it is the best information on your saber. Now how about it, lets see those markings. This may the key to proving or disproving the source of these sabers. ![]() All the Best Jeff P.S. If you are still unconvinced, I will happily save it from your sea dog collection and place it with my horsey set ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|