![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Since I didn't have the acids to do this, I had to take off chrome on a piece I am restoring right now the old fashioned way - sanding and polishing by hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
I have a friend that can remove the chrome by reverse plating but I will have to sand off the nickel myself. Then a light etch to see if there is any pattern present. The only real downside to this is that I have to take the sword completely apart.
Robert |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Actually I misspoke - I had to sand off nickel plating, not chrome. Chrome is easier to take off.
Good luck Robert. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
Jose, How did you remove the chrome on the one you are restoring?
Robert |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
Well, it was actually nickel plating, and I had to use several different grades of sand paper by hand. Then I polished it. There are still places where the plating exists and I am debating whether to take those off or not.
This was not as bad as a US Civil War foot officer's sword I restored for someone years ago that was double nickel plated. That one took a very long time.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|