![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dortmund, Germany
Posts: 102
|
![]()
@Tim & Rick
Good point. Until now i assumed that the lacquer had been added later on to preserve the hilt but you are of course right it might as well be part of the original setup to harden it against the local environment. I will leave it as it this. Amazing -- what i thought would be a lengthy restoration project turned out as being rather short... ![]() Best Regards and many thanks to all contributors, Thilo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,310
|
![]()
I would leave the grip and only add black lacquer (which I have bought at Lowe's) to what remains to maintain the integrity of the piece. I would do no more to the hilt than that.
The blade - actually looks good from here, why bother any more with it? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]()
Yep; and field repairs are part of the history of this sword .
My scabbard also shows repairs . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|