![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
It is interesting Jim, as when a weapon has been bought by a museum, it most likely ends up in the reserves, not to be seen by anyone, or almost by anyone - but when it ends up in a private collection it mostly ends up closed up, for forty or fifty years.
I don't mean that the collectors does nor care for their weapons, just the opposite, but many don't want to show them, for several reasons. Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,486
|
![]() Quote:
Whatever the case, I am just glad the research continues!! All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Chris, I also seem to remember to have read that the English stopped the wootz making in Deccan – due to deforesting as they said. One can, of course, start to speculate about how valid that argument was, but it no doubt helped them selling more English blades.
However, the wootz blades seem to have been made in other places far later than when it was stopped in Deccan. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|