![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
I am looking at Karsten Jensen's book with many Javanese kerises provenanced to the 16th and 17th century. Nearly all of them had "out-of-the-blade-profile" ron dha nunut. How is that congruent with the statement that they are quite unusual in old Javanese keris blades please? Also, looking at the 16th/17th century Shiva keris on the 1st page of this thread, it would seem to me that the ganja and gandik and sekar kacang and greneng are all very similar. What do you classify the 16th/17th Shiva keris as please? Are 19th century Javanese kerises like this? Also, I thought Balinese kerises should be smoother than Javanese kerises because they are polished before etching. In my collection, my Javanese kerises are rougher-surfaced than all my Balinese kerises. Many questions, very little answers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Empu Kumis, if you are reading this, do give us your opinion please. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
Quote:
I understand now what you were trying to say about the similarities between the "Durga" and Shiva hilts, but IMO, the first impression that the "Durga" gives me is not Bali-esque at all, but a variation of the classic Javanese planar form. It holds pretty much the same shape, just different details in the carving. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|