![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 51
|
woah trajan chum, friend, my old pal you got good taste!
any indian maces weighing you down, feel free to let me lighten your load
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
|
No kidding, eh? Impressive collection, Trajan!
It amazes me how varied the expression of form became on the Indian subcontinent... I especially like the large, spiral-flanged example. It would seem that by concentrating the mass at the striking end, the thin-flanged examples allowed for a chopping/slashing utility comparable to an edged weapon... Whereas a hilt-biased tulwar was unlikely to cut through a kulah khud, a mace with blade-like flanges stood a greater chance at penetrating armor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
|
Correct--some of the flanged ones are like tapered blades other are quite thick.
Arsenal-- I noticed you posted 2 late 19th-early 20th century devil head maces. Here are a few more to look at. The ones with the cup representing shoulders are more of a "grand Tour" item from the late 19th-early 20th century. here are a couple of bull head pieces--a standard example and a huge more ornate processional one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 35
|
Trajan this is very impressive collection of maces you have. You did mention that “maces with the cup representing shoulders are more of a "grand Tour" item from the late 19th-early 20th century”. What about the ones without the cup?? Are they earlier? I would love to find out how to distinguish the periods of Indo-Persian maces.
Also, since you such a big fan of Indo-Persian maces may be you can tell me something about the 1st peace I posted from my personal collection. Although I think it is not an actual mace but rather a horsetail standard for an officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,924
|
Here is one a couple of chums and myself made a few years back for a central Asian republic. Siver gilt, I only made the modelled bits. I cannot remeber the exact size but pretty much the same length as laEspadaAncha's Indian mace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Thanks, Aleks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,924
|
Thank you
, enough of boasting and pulling back from state regalia to items members are more likely to be able to afford. Even though this is European I had to have it. The Northern Nigerian chief pictured here must be class 4 or 3 as his mace is a little longer and has a small mace head on the top of the main one. Although not the finest work {I would expect} the crown and the lion and unicorn royal arms are hand repouse chased pieces.P.S. having said that, perhaps the royal cypher is more important than the double mace head. Also so often with personal rank regalia, less is more? ![]() P.P.S, Northern Nigeria protecterate lasted from 1900 -1914 being politically united with Southern Nigeria. Last edited by Tim Simmons; 27th August 2010 at 08:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
|
Sorry I can't help you with the horsehair piece Arsenal. I've not encountered a similar piece and my reference books had nothing as well.
as to the figural maces, there is a bull with cup as well that is of similar quality of the other cup pieces from late 19th century-early 20th century . The ones without cup are earlier. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Thanks, Aleks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,924
|
Do you mean the thing with dolphins and a lion head and a cheurb? face?
If so I have no idea what it is. Is it martial? it is showy. It looks like bone? carved like a hoof at the end? Dolphins do not strike as an image of universal military borish bombast. Perhaps something to do with the church?
Last edited by Tim Simmons; 30th August 2010 at 08:58 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|