![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#23 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes David, I agree completely. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Part of the act of appreciation is the time and place. My original comment in post #1:- We could argue that the concert goers are paying their hundreds of dollars for a total experience --- the atmosphere, the chance to rub shoulders with important people, the opportunity to be seen, photographed, and appear in the society pages. Maybe. But the violinist is the same --- subway : concert stage. Same man, same music. But unappreciated because of place. I used the Josh Bell example because I believe that it is pretty well known. I've had it quoted to me in at least three different situations, and quoted to illustrate at least three different ideas. What I wanted to do was to give a simple, easily understood example to demonstrate that the act of appreciation does depend upon more than the thing being appreciated. I keep coming back to this:- for one reason or another art or an object can make us feel good why? if I read back through the posts to this thread I think I can see a common idea that has been expressed in a number of ways I believe it is this idea that is what this thread is about.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |