![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Attached examples of 2 Balinese and 1 N Malayan "out-of-blade-profile" greneng and 2 Javanese "within-the-blade-profile" greneng.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
I found a 'brother keris' in Karsten Jensen's book. Note the Shiva hilt. Very similar to the Durga hilt here. Dated to 16th/17th century.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Poland, Krakow
Posts: 418
|
![]()
Thank you for kind words
BluErf and nechesh: thank you for your opinions and photos. Few answers: there is no sheath ![]() I wouldn't be surprised if it was older than 19th century, but I'm not assuming it either. This kris is from the very, very good collection, of one of the famous noble Polish family. "Unfortunately" they gathered mainly European firearms and some Polish weapons, but you can find there also few other things, like this keris. Because they didn't left any clues about these pieces, I can't tell you how they purchased them and when. Regards! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
I would say that the blade of this keris is balinese. The ukiran is lovely and I believe together with the mendak javanese. The crack in the ukiran probably ocurred because the peksi was winded with to much cloth to secure the ukiran. When you still push the ukiran on the peksi it will crack.
Nevertheless it is a beautifull ukiran. Maybe you can remove it and remove some cloth. Probably the ukiran will fit better. Or find an balinese ukiran and display the mendak with ukiran as a javanese piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|