![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, i have read it before ... and now again. You will pardon me but, there must be a rational limit for variations; otherwise anything may be similar to anything else. Or, let's say that i admit not being keen enough to discern the familiarity with such variations . Also i confess i am much influenced by some scholar who says that, the position of the tang, in relation to the blade, is a vital symptom. ... Like when the tang in centered with the blade means German (Visigod and other), and when it is projected from the back edge would be Iberian. Hope you get my meaning ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
A few days ago i have had a local opinion on this piece, which sounded fairly reasonable, as within not far from some of the impressions posted here, namely those from Lee: an utility knife of the afalcatado style, from the Ibero-Roman period.
Ibero-Roman appears to be a term preferred over here, in detriment of the Hispano-Roman attribution used abroad. I guess that the afalcatado (falcata like) type should be interpreted in a broad sense. Being its typology an issue that may still constitute a riddle, specialy being of peasant's manufacture, i will take its age range reiterated suggestion worthy of consideration ( I-V century AD). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|