![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 228
|
Hi,
Sene 1278 = 1861/62 A.D. First part is also very eligible but we need someone who knows the language of the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
even through Arabic language, it's illegible à + Dom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,237
|
Hello Dom,
Thanks for joining. Do you mean the whole writing is ilegible or just the first ? I believe there is a parts arabic (red) and a part that is some western inititials carved in at later date (in blue) Am I correct on that ? Best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,237
|
Ok, I will hide myself under a rock and not be shown for some time Thanks Dom ! Thanks for the explanation. This will surely help understanding these inscriptions in the future. This also makes me very curious to the elegible part. That must be something local / sumatran. Let's see if we can find some more helpers ![]() Best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 238
|
We have to understand the vocabulary to read jawi because there is no vowel mark/harakat, but it sounded close enough to admir or samir & muhamad or mukamad, but again might read something else. In this particular case the script is rather vague. I think we should read the number in this direction <- no?
Maybe there's a better opinion from someone else, but hope this help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|