![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
In the flattened cone shape of the grip I can see what you mean.....I suspect the handle was originally covered with leather. I don't know why this leaps to my mind with this particular piece. The narrow pinky grabber is unusual, no? The offset grooves do not seem like E African swords? More like Congo region/central/West Africa? Afrasians and E coast Africans seem to prefer symetrically grooved/midribbed blades?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
What thoughts about the two bands where a belt or belts or something attached to the sheath? I can see the relation to takouba and to Manding swords there.......but would this be worn like a longsword? Manding might be a good guess; I can see where one might lean toward the area of division between Berber and Bantu......unorganized morning thoughts.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
Hello Tom.
I don't think that the handle in orgin was covered with leather: the patination on it is very deep and dark and i think that a kind of color can create only with many many years. I know that normally the Manding sword are the handle wrapped with leather, but this could be a poor version. About the two bands where a belt could be attached, i think that are only for decoration, because on the other side of the scabbard there is already a broken belt. The decoration on the scabbard, like the material used, is quite tipical of the west Africa and all the sudanese region, maybe also Tuareg. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|