![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: New Zealand 
				
				
					Posts: 298
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This is one of those grey areas. The steel scabbard would be more typical for a cavalry officer as it is harder wearing for when mounted. Leather is lighter and makes less noise when walking about. The blade is short at 71cm (28 inches), not suited to mounted combat. But I've seen dress swords with steel scabbards as well.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	But then an officer that could afford an ivory-hilted sword is equally likely to be mounted regardless of service, it's anyone's guess really. Given that the British had only three (four?) Rifles Regiments in the regular army at the time, I would say on the balance of probabilities that it belonged to a Cavalry Officer.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |