|  | 
|  28th June 2025, 01:12 AM | #31 | |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Germany 
					Posts: 273
				 |   Quote: 
 Kind regards Robin | |
|   |   | 
|  28th June 2025, 02:07 AM | #32 | 
| Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 
					Posts: 10,660
				 |   
			
			You are a very gracious man Robin. We all hate to be bearers of bad tidings but want to honest. It is a beautifully made sword regardless, and many collectors are aesthetic oriented seeing the artistic merits rather than historic elements. In cases like this, a little of both as the interpretations are often based on traditional and historic values.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  28th June 2025, 05:57 PM | #33 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Eastern Sierra 
					Posts: 511
				 |   
			
			Great point everyone. Really good discussion of an interesting item. Noone has mentioned something I find really interesting. The snake's head is on the inside (medial) aspect of the handle as it is carried. I guess that would make it more comfortable in the hand and could still be seen carried as a saber at an angle, but, still, it's an interesting design aspect to me. The northern Indian/Afghan ideas seems a good one. The Afghans liked their swords in the 20th century to my understanding. The pommel shape looks familiar, is it a Deccan, Vijayanagar reference? | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |