Yes David, I agree completely. 
 
Part of the act of appreciation is the time and place. 
 
My original comment in post #1:- 
 
 
We could argue that the concert goers are paying their hundreds of dollars for a total experience --- the atmosphere, the chance to rub shoulders with important people, the opportunity to be seen, photographed, and appear in the society pages. Maybe. But the violinist is the same --- subway : concert stage. Same man, same music. But unappreciated because of place. 
 
 
I used the Josh Bell example because I believe that it is pretty well known. I've had it quoted to me in at least three different situations, and quoted to illustrate at least three different ideas. What I wanted to do was to give a simple, easily understood example to demonstrate that the act of appreciation does depend upon more than the thing being appreciated. 
 
I keep coming back to this:- 
 
for one reason or another art or an object can make us feel good 
 
why? 
 
if I read back through the posts to this thread I think I can see a common idea that has been expressed in a number of ways 
 
I believe it is this idea that is what this thread is about.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 |