|
25th January 2021, 04:59 PM | #1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,574
|
Quote:
Like said, I've handled this piece before it went to Paolo, scabbard and handle has been painted and on all stick out places the wood was visible with a real nice patination, it was 2006/7 old when not antique, I remember this very well since I thought to this time to see a much younger piece but by close examination I have to agree with Wolfgang. He has shown me this thread later and was very angry that some people stated that it's recent. The pictures from Paolo are sadly not very meaningful. What's interesting is that the handle and scabbard from Gonzoadlers piece have the same overall appearance like this old one. Traditional style?? |
|
25th January 2021, 06:12 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,152
|
See also http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ghlight=kujang
Mine for comparison, it has a fairly large blade, about a foot long. |
26th January 2021, 03:42 PM | #3 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,047
|
Quote:
|
|
26th January 2021, 07:40 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,738
|
David, I would tend to agree that this style of dress probably is not particularly old, but my personal opinion is that it could go back to perhaps a bit before WWII, maybe the 1920's.
This is opinion only, not something I am able to substantiate, but I have seen similar styles of dress on various other items of tosan aji that were supposedly, and looked to be, from the late colonial era, ie pre-WWII. |
26th January 2021, 09:55 PM | #5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,047
|
Thanks Alan, that's good to know.
|
26th January 2021, 10:51 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,574
|
Yes, the 1920's is a time frame which is possible for the scabbard and handle from Paolo's kujang.
Wolfgang doesn't care anymore, he is deceased, But I am miffed since you don't believe my words! |
27th January 2021, 04:18 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,738
|
Detlef, I believe you absolutely, moreover I believe whoever gave you the information that you passed on, but what I believe is that Wolfgang, and the others who were responsible for this information did not provide you with information that they knew was incorrect.
This sort of thing is always a problem, because when we state an age for something that does not have some sort of very clear proof of age, all we are doing is expressing an opinion. Some opinions are perhaps better than others, but I doubt that any serious and well known personage such as Wolfgang was, would deliberately give an opinion that he had cause to believe was incorrect. So Wolfgang believed in his estimate of age, and you believed him. I believe in my estimate, David believes in his estimate, and really, none of us can prove anything. So why not just let precise age go and accept that we are looking at something with some age. Forget the "antique" idea, it is a fatuous concept at the best of times, just think in terms of era:- Late Colonial. |
27th January 2021, 05:02 PM | #8 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,047
|
Quote:
More of what was getting at in my opinion is that this form of dress is probably still relatively recent for kujang and not really the kind of dress we are likely to see on old kujang from periods when they were a more active part of Sundanese culture. |
|
|
|