Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23rd October 2022, 12:38 AM   #7
shayde78
Member
 
shayde78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 443
Default

Thanks everyone!
Very helpful information and interesting thoughts.

Regarding the missing bit from the pommel - it may be this occurs on many examples of this type of sword simply because the brass tacks weaken the wood causing it to break along the lines created by the tacks.
If this were an intentional feature the handle could simply be carved differently.

However, if considered an ergonomical improvement, it is oriented to allow greater range of movement when the blade is oriented to used the inside edge. This usage would be quite effective if the point is the intended striking area. Much like the mambele, or from other regions, the lohar, zahgnal, etc, using an arching swing to deliver a stabbing point is a devastating attack.
shayde78 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.