![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Yes Ariel is right, that was Tirri's theory - and so far we dont know if it is correct.
Kubur, the thing about the handle was not from me, but from Krochew #52. Anyway, missing disc or not, lets have a look at the tulwar. The hilt is very vorn, and the blade seems to be quite old as well - so how old would you think it is? To be save, I would say early 18th century, but it could be older. Bids are open :-). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Paul writes in his book that the pommel disk was there for a purpose: it created a very tight grip, and this tightness resulted in the emotion of “josh”, something that can be loosely explained as aggressiveness, daring, absence of fear. Perhaps, a better translation would be “amok” or “berserk”.
Perhaps. Realistically, tight grip and the disk immobilized wrist movements, forcing the fighter to slash from the elbow or the shoulder. As a result, in conjunction with curved Tulwar profile, it essentially eliminated the possibility of stabbing movements. This was repeatedly stressed by European travelers. In part, this limitation could be more or less overcome by curving the index finger over the quillon or by the European “ thumb ring” . But then, which finger are you more willing to sacrifice? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|