|
19th October 2019, 04:07 AM | #1 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,785
|
Ed, very sorry, I think my perspective was in retrospect out of line. My objective was to have more information on what details brought the 'decorator' designation so as to better understand what to look for. Actually, the identity of the guy is irrelevant so I should have ignored that.
My regrets to you and Glen, it was not my intent to cause this. |
21st October 2019, 11:20 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 248
|
I remember I read some 12 years ago:
GOGAN, Art. Fighting Iron. A metals Handbook for Arms Collectors. Lincoln 1999, Andrew Mowbray. ISBN 0 917218 86 8. SMITH, Cyril Stanley. A History of Metallography: The Development of Ideas on the Structure of Metals before 1890. Cambridge/ London 1988, The MIT Press. ISBN 0 262 69120 5. And there was no cast steel used in weaponry before middle XVIIIth century. Cast iron was used in guns and cannonballs, but it was unreliable in this task until 1620s, and not used in swords. Too brittle. Are you sure the piece is cast and not just carved and welded? Now, my memory is worse by the day, so I could be remembering corrupted data. I got myself entangled in a Victorian cast iron rapier hilt not long ago... |
23rd October 2019, 07:09 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 492
|
In receiving the piece and my following replies, I did see that some parts were certainly not cast. However if you look at the first set of photos regarding the plates, the face of it and openings sure do look cast to me and not cast iron (as we think of cast iron.
Bear with me as I have read differently and in regard to sword fittings. The following 17th century "chiseled" fittings, certainly beginning with castings. I will endeavor to dig up what I had read to confirm that. Cast steel for blade work, yes well noted and developed for cutlery in England. Then you have crucible steel (cast steel/wootz/bulat) going back many centuries. fwiw, those images in my files and reworked regarding exactly the same topic in 2008 re cast steel objects The supporting text escapes me at the moment Cheers GC Last edited by Hotspur; 23rd October 2019 at 05:26 PM. |
23rd October 2019, 07:31 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 492
|
Here is one but not what I was looking for
"The casting of iron artefacts also became common during the 16th century, but in the initial period after the introduction of the blast furnace in the late 15th century artefacts were mainly cast directly from the melting furnace. The first separate iron foundries probably appeared by the mid-17th century. " Keep in mind that modern cast iron goes way beyond the carbon footprint in blade steel. http://hist-met.org/images/pdf/HMSdatasheet304.pdf Huntsman, 1740 and Wilkinson patents entirely voluminous topics we could regard but look at the last photo (with the red background) showing the face of the plates. Much like those chased pommels shown in the last post, I see castings. Just my thoughts. Cheers GC Another https://www.engr.psu.edu/mtah/timeli...compare_et.pdf |
23rd October 2019, 08:04 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
|
Is the grip material different from that of the rest of the hilt?
|
26th October 2019, 10:07 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 492
|
Quote:
Cheers GC |
|
1st November 2019, 10:22 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 492
|
While looking for something entirely different, I came across this old thread here that displays a lot of casting work.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=18464 Cheers GC |
|
|