Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th December 2022, 10:15 AM   #1
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Will M View Post
A frame can work for this but you only see one side and becomes two dimensional. I like open display having three dimensions however the choice is yours and it will be great to see the results. I would remove the recent corrosion then coat the sword in a rust stabilizer that tends to darken the iron.
It makes for a pleasing finish. Iron and steel were valuable and I can only imagine it's rare to find a damaged sword.
Of course you are right regerading the frame / stand. On the other hand: also on a stand one can only see one side. Maybe I´ll do both and change from time to time I will show you images, once it is done.

The corrusion seems different on the images. It is old rust / patina, which was partly remvoved. There is no new rust, even if it appears so on the images.

@ Lee: Thank you for your example. Can you tell what is written on the blade?

Kind regards
Andreas
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th December 2022, 02:14 PM   #2
Lee
EAAF Staff
 
Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AHorsa View Post
Can you tell what is written on the blade?
It is an iron inlaid, typically misspelt, "In nomine Domini" without spaces and between crosses potent.
Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2022, 09:32 PM   #3
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee View Post
It is an iron inlaid, typically misspelt, "In nomine Domini" without spaces and between crosses potent.
Thank you, Lee!

I assume, that the fragment was,t cleaned in 1996, when Katkin did the drawin from #11. This would explain, why the detail of the quillon stepped in three parts wasn´t mentioned. I browsed many pictures of swords but couldn´t find an example with a similar parrier rod / quillons. Does anyone have an example of such?

Thanks and kind regards
Andreas
Attached Images
 
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2022, 05:39 PM   #4
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Here´s a picture of the sword with its acryl stand.

Kind regards
Andreas
Attached Images
 
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2022, 05:42 PM   #5
Merenti
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 62
Default

looks very good! some museums can take an example.
Merenti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2022, 09:47 AM   #6
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Thank you, mate!
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2022, 03:50 PM   #7
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AHorsa View Post
I browsed many pictures of swords but couldn´t find an example with a similar parrier rod / quillons. Does anyone have an example of such?
I could only find one close example, from Romania, in the Szekely National Museum. There is also a more well-known sword from Sweden that has a similar detail, but in the middle of the quillon and not at the tip.

https://www.albion-swords.com/swords...spirations.htm

PS. Display looks great!
Attached Images
 
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2022, 04:22 PM   #8
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Mark, thank you so much again!
Is there a date for the Romanian sword?

Kind regards
Andreas
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2022, 05:08 PM   #9
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
Default

I think the museum and publications have only dated it as 14th century. I would guess earlier in the century rather than later. Picture is from the article "Középkorikardok a Székely Nemzeti Múzeum gyűjteményeiben".
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2022, 06:28 PM   #10
AHorsa
Member
 
AHorsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reventlov View Post
I think the museum and publications have only dated it as 14th century. I would guess earlier in the century rather than later. Picture is from the article "Középkorikardok a Székely Nemzeti Múzeum gyűjteményeiben".
Thank you very much!
AHorsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.