|
17th September 2020, 03:41 AM | #1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,785
|
Quote:
Wow Bryce, I had not noticed this..........mine has the ring around base of pommel......kinda looks Scottish? Is that not like placed on basket hilts? The others all seem to go into aperture in pommel. What pushes me toward post 1760 is the pommel shape, and the slotted guard with this clipped point blade. That pommel ring just threw me a curve. |
|
17th September 2020, 06:53 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 174
|
|
17th September 2020, 07:32 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 174
|
Here is another like yours I found on the web.
Cheers, Bryce |
17th September 2020, 02:39 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 390
|
Hello Bryce I take it you are saying "pommel and guard attachment" can date these swords and post 1760 would have the guard with a ring just forward of the pommel?
|
17th September 2020, 07:40 PM | #5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,785
|
Bryce thank you!!! I had heard of Potters's but had no idea. I think I have been obsessed with the clipped point.
In this incredible article (again I cannot thank you enough), it is noted that the 'Potter' was based on the British 'pattern' 1756 ? Could this have been a 'light dragoon' design with the ring around pommel base often seen on basket hilts? Could this be a 'Potter'....but I found it in London ? The article shows a trooper with a 'captured' one. |
17th September 2020, 07:58 PM | #6 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,785
|
Quote:
|
|
17th September 2020, 11:55 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 174
|
G'day Will,
I don't know. I am just speculating that these swords with the ring attachment may be later, as this type of sword seems to have been in use during the American war of independence. Jim, The similar sword is for sale somewhere in the US. It is described as a revolutionary war dragoon sword. That article suggests that the "Potter" swords were based on British swords and also that some of the British forces were using "Potter" swords as well, so it wouldn't be surprising that you found your sword in London. Can you have a look at your sword to see if it has a Potter stamp? Cheers, Bryce |
18th September 2020, 09:59 PM | #8 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,785
|
Quote:
Thanks Bryce, apparently James Potter of New York City was a loyalist and making these swords for the British cavalry assigned in America. The swords were extremely favored and acquired by a number of the Patriot forces. The term POTTER sword became sort of a standard. I wish I could see the blade but the pitting is profuse overall unfortunately. Potter began in 1778 and ceased in 1781 when he removed to Nova Scotia. This material I found last night after digging through all the references I could find. I think the type of ring attachment on my sword is more in line with those on basket hilts of c. 1750s including certain other dragoon sword types. It is most curious to see this type pommel ring with the tall olive pommel and four slot guard which seem more toward 1770. |
|
19th September 2020, 01:44 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 492
|
As noted in the ASAC article. there were other makers making similar swords. The Potter swords were made to a pattern satisfying British wants, so it stands to reason they mimic the English swords.
Look also to the Hanoverian influences to the egg shape pommels and slotted hilts. Cheers GC |
|
|