|
4th February 2020, 09:14 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
Thank you, Giovanni!
Probably these guards were made by the same swordsmith or in one workshop. |
5th February 2020, 06:13 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Congratulations, Evgeny. The simpler hilt construction of yours is a quite early design, your estimate of dates is right, and this style is seldom found. I don't object to the slightly shortened blade; these were issued for combat, not parade and occasional damages like this can be expected. The early hilt design more than makes up for it.
|
5th February 2020, 06:44 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
|
|
6th February 2020, 03:58 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
another example
Here's one in a private collection. The very simple guard on these has a "proto-" look, I think it is the immediate predecessor to the form that Ewart Oakeshott called Type I (the Stibbert example posted above has one of those guards). As regards the sword in this post, I have a gut feeling that the pommel may be a later replacement but I leave it to other forum members to comment as well.
|
7th February 2020, 11:46 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
Evengy is a lucky one :-)
Hello everyone,
Philipp, I think the Sciavona that you posted is completely assembled (errors excepted, of course) And thanks for praise to Evgeny's sword. I was amazed at the reluctance in the forum for this unique piece. I have never seen this quality in any museum. Evgeny, your sciavona has only one serious mistake: It is not mine :-) Keep it as it is. A nice week-end. |
7th February 2020, 06:31 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|