![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
Norman, The big crowned "L" is from Ludwig, making is Bavarian for sure. See this website : http://www.worldbayonets.com/Misc__P..._markings.html 5 R. : being 5th regiment sounds logical. I will post some more pics shortly. best regards, Willem |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,644
|
![]()
Hi Willem,
Many thanks for the info re the bayonet. The 15 below the crowned L would suggest, as you rightly say, Ludwig III of Bavaria (1913-1918) with a date of 1915 for the bayonet itself. The enigma is the crowned K which appears below the crowned L suggesting Karl of Wurttemberg (1864-1891) on a 1898/05 bayonet !!!! Any ideas gratefully accepted ![]() My Regards, Norman. Last edited by Norman McCormick; 8th March 2010 at 07:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Older "surplus" blade in a "new" mount...?
I have seen Charles III 18th C blades in 19th C swords... M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
|
![]()
Hi,
coming back to the first question about the tale of the sawtooth. I have seen a bayo in an auction from which the sawtooth was removed. But i would agree with Jim that it was in fact more unpractical to leave the weapon and this was the reason why. Dirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
|
![]()
yes, exactly like this
Dirk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
It is interesting to note that medieval European carpentry saws often had a sword-like hilt, similar to modern Japanese saws, but apparently often with a round handguard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|