Fixing grip wires?

[celtan]

Hi Kisak,

It's always a pleasure to read your comments on swedish steel. Thank you kindly for expanding my limited knowledge of same.

I'm aware the naval saber isn't exactly the fancy-schmancy type. But then, it is precisely it's simplicity and clean lines that attract me. : )

BTW, I own a couple swords that I haven't been able to ID. The first was initially labeled as a french mameluke sword, the second seems to be some sort of academic/cadet sword.

Could they be swedish? Does anything similar appear on SB?

Best

Manolo


pics:

Originally Posted by kisak

I would date it to 1770-1809, based on the hilt type. In 1770 a new saber type was adopted for Swedish naval officers, which seems to have called for a hilt shaped like yours, with the details of both the blade and the hilt decoration left to the taste of the individual officers (though an anchor on the guard may have been mandatory). There's no sign of this hilt type prior to 1770 though in Berg's Svenska Blankvapen.

Given the relatively simple decoration on yours, I would suspect that it was made for someone who didn't have very deep pockets, especially as it doesn't look gilded to me.

It would take until 1824 before a new model was adopted for naval officers, but I doubt any quantity of swords with this hilt type were ever made after 1809. In Sweden this hilt type is known as Gustavian (the Gustavian style being what was in fashion under Gustav III by and large). These hilts remained fashionable under the reign of Gustav IV as well.

However, Gustav IV lost Finland to Russia (quite the national trauma, Finland had been Swedish since the middle ages), was forced to abdicate by a military coup, and eventually replaced by the French marshal Jean Baptiste Bernadotte (who reigned as Karl XIV Johan). As a result of this the Gustavian hilt went out of fashion in a hurry, largely replaced by French styles. The youngest Gustavian hilt shown in the volumes of Svenska Blankvapen that I have at hand is dated to 1810.

Given that officers were generally allowed quite a bit of freedom in arming themselves, I suspect that few followed the regulations there in the period 1809-1824. 39 years after initial adoption the old pattern was probably starting to get a bit dated anyway, as far as taste and fashion went.

[kisak]

Originally Posted by celtan

I'm aware the naval saber isn't exactly the fancy-schmancy type. But then, it is precisely it's simplicity and clean lines that attract me. : )

BTW, I own a couple swords that I haven't been able to ID. The first was initially labeled as a french mameluke sword, the second seems to be some sort of academic/cadet sword.

Could they be swedish? Does anything similar appear on SB?

Best

Manolo

More of a good, honest blade than a general's jewellery, yes.

As for the others, I can't recall seeing anything matching in style to either labelled as Swedish (SB, Seitz' Svärdet och Värjan, The Army Museum's exhibits, various local auctions), so I'd consider it unlikely that they're from around here.

The mameluke hilt doesn't seem to have really caught on up here, and what we have in the way of symmetrical cross-hilts from that period tend to be on civilian swords of honour, quite different in both style and materials from tat one (often gilt brass hilts with mother-of-pearl or Älvdals-porphyry grips).

[celtan]

Thanks again, Kisak.

Exactly my thoughts. I actually dislike foppish, decorative officer's swords... : )

Regarding the mameluke sword, I found a period drawing of a mameluke-de-la-garde carrying a similar looking sword. But the french always marked their swords, and this one is not.

The second one, I have literally just found some info on it. Seems to be a late 1800s fraternal sword made by Ames (Grecian Sword) of either the IOOF (Independent Order of Odd Fellows), or for use by the Masters of Ceremonies of the US Knights of Pythias.

Best

Manolo

Originally Posted by kisak

More of a good, honest blade than a general's jewellery, yes.

As for the others, I can't recall seeing anything matching in style to either labelled as Swedish (SB, Seitz' Svärdet och Värjan, The Army Museum's exhibits, various local auctions), so I'd consider it unlikely that they're from around here.

The mameluke hilt doesn't seem to have really caught on up here, and what we have in the way of symmetrical cross-hilts from that period tend to be on civilian swords of honour, quite different in both style and materials from tat one (often gilt brass hilts with mother-of-pearl or Älvdals-porphyry grips).