![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Quote:
May you succeed ! I am looking forward to 'disappointment' .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
This is such a cool sword, I really do hope you can dig up some photos of the blade, Radu!
The Japanese connection is apparant to me in the tsuba-like guard and the cosmetic "seppa" and "habaki" at the forte. These features do, as Mark has illustrated, appear on some SEA weapons, likely the result of Japanese or, perhaps, Chinese influence. Some questions: is the handle round in cross-section? It appears to be, albeit flaring towards the pommel. Conical? Does the blade have a ridge-line, like a shinogi, or is it a wedge cross-section? If a ridge-line is present, the Japanese connection gets ever stronger, and if a wedge, with that flat spine, I'm leaning more and more toward's Mark's theory. The tip geometry, and blade construction may well decide matters as to influence and/or origin of the blade. Tom's note about the tang may be impossible to ever learn, but would also be very edifying. Please keep us posted, Radu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
One often sees transverse grind lines on Asian swords. Usually, though not always, there are longwise ones over them, and they are spotty remnants; uneraddicated deep grind lines. However, this blade appears to have been soft-buffed? The lines aren't ground out; they seem smeared or blurred. Note also the squared spine. The habiki, which seems integral to the guard (?) seems to fit flush, meaning the steel is undercut, all around, and is not inlet at the spine.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|