![]() |
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
The keris shown on P. 234 of Tammens, Vol. 2 does not share the same characteristics as the keris posted by gwirya.
The Tammens example appears to be a ligan, or keris pedang; I say "appears to be", because all we can see is the outline of the blade. One thing is certain:- it is most definitely not a keris of cundrik form. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|