![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Another scythe...
Russian? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Amazing ... and fascinating.
The thing is so curved that the suspension rings are on the contrary side of the scabbard. ... no wonder ![]() Fernando |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
BTW, what's the average length for the French M1822 saber blade?
This one has a 34 3/4" long blade, width 1.25" at the ricasso, and .75" near the rounded tip. The blade was originally even longer, back before the tip was rounded. M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() 'Nando' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
... But if you are measuring yours it in a straight line, then its miles longer than a 1822 ... correct ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
|
![]() Quote:
After 1884, all remaining swords issued to troops were supposed to be shortened to 87.5 cm hence Fernando's measure. Best, Jean |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Jean,
Since mine is 88.26 cm _after_ having the tip rounded, it means that originally it was the longer 92.25 version, and the blade was never adjusted to the shorter post-1884 regs. It also suggests that the scythe shape was most probably done while the original longer blades prevailed, before 1884'. Had it been a modified post-1884 blade, after rounding the tip, it would have been about 82 cm long. (minus ~4 cms.). Thank you for your contributions, I just read your other comments on the AN XI sabre de cavalerie legere. They always make for interesting reading! Best regards Manuel [QUOTE=Jean B.]Originaly, the regulation length for a French Mle 1822 light cavalry sword is 92.5 cm which is about 36.4 inches. After 1884, all remaining swords issued to troops were supposed to be shortened to 87.5 cm hence Fernando's measure. Best, Jean Last edited by celtan; 17th November 2008 at 05:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nothern Mexico
Posts: 458
|
![]()
With all due respect, in my modest forging knowledge, curving in such way a blade already fullered, presents a great deal of difficulty. The problem is not no make the curve, but the metal in the outside of the curve strechtes and the inside make wrinkles, as the metal is shrinked, even in hot. So, the form of the edge, the fuller and the back must be reshapen, and the blade tempered again, grinded and polished. I wonder if this can be made on a blade already finished, and without extra material to work and expend. I would love to learn how can this be made, as my knowledge on this matter is not sufficient.
Regards Gonzalo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, I agree it is amazing, but the marking and military inspector's mark give the assurance that the sword, once in its lifetime, matches the military standard and patterns of this government controlled factory and is the property of the government (the French ministry of war paid for it). For me it is similar as if I find a military M16 rifle, with all the proof markings and a serial number corresponding to a batch sold to the US government years ago. And marking show also it was issue, and reissued, to the service. But...it has a knot made with the barrel. Now, what hypothesis will I choose? 1) The US army ordered to the factory a batch of M16 with a knot in the barrel and issued it to troops. However there are no traces of such order or trials in archives and no other examples of a similar rifle in museums or military patterns room. 2) An armourer took a standard M16 rifle from military stock and managed to make a knot with the barrel. I think I can only choose number 2 even if I 'll keep asking myself how this bloody armourer managed to make the knot in the barrel and...without altering the rifling! I know the example is extravagant but it is only to show my reasoning process. Cheers, Jean Last edited by Jean B.; 21st November 2008 at 10:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]() Quote:
An astute and valid observation. Be interesting to have an answer. How were they forged? Cheers Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() If it had the edge by the inside, it would be useful for cutting grass ![]() Where did you get this picture ... is it confidential ? Fernando |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Fernando,
No, it's not confidential at all, I plumb forgot. Best M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,464
|
![]() Quote:
Unbelievable!!! I have seen parabolic blades before.....but NEVER one this dramatic! Most definitely Russian, I believe these as well as many of thier regulation patterns were based on captured French Napoleonic weapons (I dont have my copy of Mollo handy, "Russian Military Swords" Eugene Mollo). I believe this hilt was based on the French model ANXI.....but have no idea what was behind this blade. The carrying rings are on the opposed side as was characteristic of thier military swords, as well as shashkas. All best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|