![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
That's a nice little keris, Ferry. I don't think we can call it a betok, though. Betok are usually considered to be a bit more broad across. To me, it looks like it might have been made simply as a short keris, or maybe shortened during its life.
I would not be confident to comment of the quality of the iron just from a photograph. Tell me, can you give us a photo of the top of the gonjo? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
the gonjo part. This is the best picture I can show to you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
Sorry Ferry, its not really good enough.
Tell me, is the buntut urang nguceng mati ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
OK---thanks.
What tangguh do you think it might be? Its too hard to guess from the pics. Its not a typical form and the proportions are peculiar. If you can lay a supportable tangguh onto it, you might be able to form an opinion as to whether it was made like this, or it has been shortened. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
has been shortened??? if only it has been shortened, then it might also been re shape though??? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
Yeah, it looks a bit Tubanishy, but I can't see if the sirah cecak is the right shape---looks a bit that way, but you really need to look straight down on it. A Tuban buntut urang is not quite nguceng mati, but it sure isn't nyebit rontal---its a straight,heavy, pretty ugly gonjo that looks like the tail has been cut off, which results in it looking like a shortened nguceng mati---that is, if it was longer, it would be.
However the iron looks too black for Tuban. The Pawakan will be more or less ovoid if its Tuban. This blade seems to have some Tuban characteristics, but as always, its a bit hard to tell from a photo. Yeah, I'd say it could have been reshaped---the pawakan is out of balance---see the way it tends to sort of lean forward, but its not really leaning forward? Proportion and balance is wrong. But even so, its still not a real bad thing--- it all depends on whether you like it or not, and how much you paid for it. You'd be surprised at some of my favourite keris. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|