![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 202
|
![]()
Arjan,
Here are two golok hilts that might, in my opinion, be similar to the hilt of your golok how it looked in its original state. Regards, Albert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
|
![]() Quote:
thanks I see indeed some similarity in those hilts. But at the other point, should there not be a loss of patina when the piece was broken off? And what doesn't seem Javanese too me is the connection hilt-scabbard what has more in common with Banjarese weapons. Also golok scabbards has mostly a ( also on the pic you listed) scabbardmouth that broader than the scabbard so it can be stucked between the sarong.Also the surface of wich should be broken shows excatly the same patina of the whole handle and the hair is attached very good , no bad drillholes or anything. Or do we have here a javanese golok captured in Borneo and adorned on the Dayak way? regards, Arjan. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 202
|
![]()
Hi Arjan,
You indeed would expect there to be a loss of patina when a piece brakes off. On the other hand, if it happened a long time ago and the sword was regularly used afterwards, on a rough surface the difference could disappear. A scabbardmouth that is smaller than the hilt is not very usual on Java, but it, for instance, does appear on the javanese pedang lurus. A javanese golok captured in Borneo and adorned on the Dayak way, as you suggest, could be possible but is, I think, a bit of a wild guess. All the same it is a nice sword! Regards, Albert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|