![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 400
|
![]() Quote:
dear Ben, at first: You wrote your answer between the lines I have written in my answer so it looks almost if I have written it, maybe you can edit that? second: reading before you answer should provide a long and unessesary discussion. thirth: Indeed Salomon Muller says in Juynboll that the Dohong is probably taken over from another culture because he says that it maybe is from the times that "Modjapit rules about the coasts of Borneo" good possible because the blade of the Dohong looks like very old Modjapit daggers.So not Arababs did have their influence on the Dohong but the Hindu. ( however the Arabs did trade in this area) fourth: (reading before you write) was Schwaner talking about a Bayu when he used the word "Dohong" and talked about a 8 inch turned ivory round and thick hilt? Of course not! You can't beat the facts Ben! ![]() five:I still stay with my opinion that the hilt is of malay origin, the hilts of the 18th and 19th Pattani parangs and Anak Wali's are almost of the same shape. As Borneo is a mix of diverse tribal influences also its of course possible that the dohong is also a mix creation of Hindu influence with Malay details. six: please stay reading as professional as your way of collecting,you are a marvelous collector! The treads in this forum are to help eachother with ideas,knowledge and study.But only by staying professional readers we can lift this forum to the high unique level it deserves! best regards, Arjan. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|