1730 Rapier or a Victorian 'Copy' .........any ideas?

Marc · 24th November 2006, 09:48 AM

With the usual disclaimer about how cautious one has to be doing evaluations through photographs...
I would say it's a "Victorian Copy", meaning it's a piece made for decoration, probably quite some time ago, but not that much as 1730. It's an attempt to a cup-hilt rapier, but it's only intended to look kind of well in a wall. Not even the blade seems original, also, but I would need better pics to really say that. Just some hints, as I don't like to just drop statements without some reasoning behind: the quillions are wrong, in shape and section, the construction of the hilt is wrong, the different elements don't harmonize together, and the blade, as I said, for what little I've seen is wrong, too. And, if the weight is correct, then it's too heavy, also. I apologize for not being more precise, but I'm a bit shorto fo time, right now.

I'm sorry.

spiral · 24th November 2006, 11:25 AM

Nearly 4 1/2 pounds in weight!

So No chance its a real fighting rapier, so then i would say it must be a wallhanger.

Spiral

Ian · 24th November 2006, 04:00 PM

The date inscription is definitely later than 1730. If applied at the time of the manufacture of the blade, this one is a fake.

Ian.

katana · 24th November 2006, 07:56 PM

I appreciate all your valued comments, especially Marc , for the extra information....my gut reaction was Victorian ...its the pommel with peening which made me take the risk. The weight given is approx. for shipping purposes so it is less than that....but by how much ..I can't say.....what is a reasonable weight ...if this was a genuine sword?

I suppose my only hope is that this 'sword' could be several 'cobbled' together ....all those years ago......and hopefully not to create a 'wallhanger'.......Ah hope springs eternal ...... will have to wait and see.

I also suspect that it has some monetary value as a 'Victorian curio', if anyone has any idea of it's worth (as a curio) please PM me thankyou.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24th November 2006, 09:48 AM	#1
Marc Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Madrid / Barcelona Posts: 256	With the usual disclaimer about how cautious one has to be doing evaluations through photographs... I would say it's a "Victorian Copy", meaning it's a piece made for decoration, probably quite some time ago, but not that much as 1730. It's an attempt to a cup-hilt rapier, but it's only intended to look kind of well in a wall. Not even the blade seems original, also, but I would need better pics to really say that. Just some hints, as I don't like to just drop statements without some reasoning behind: the quillions are wrong, in shape and section, the construction of the hilt is wrong, the different elements don't harmonize together, and the blade, as I said, for what little I've seen is wrong, too. And, if the weight is correct, then it's too heavy, also. I apologize for not being more precise, but I'm a bit shorto fo time, right now. I'm sorry.

24th November 2006, 11:25 AM	#2
spiral Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,712	Nearly 4 1/2 pounds in weight! So No chance its a real fighting rapier, so then i would say it must be a wallhanger. Spiral

24th November 2006, 04:00 PM	#3
Ian Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Aussie Bush Posts: 4,515	The date inscription is definitely later than 1730. If applied at the time of the manufacture of the blade, this one is a fake. Ian.

24th November 2006, 07:56 PM	#4
katana Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Kent Posts: 2,658	I appreciate all your valued comments, especially Marc , for the extra information....my gut reaction was Victorian ...its the pommel with peening which made me take the risk. The weight given is approx. for shipping purposes so it is less than that....but by how much ..I can't say.....what is a reasonable weight ...if this was a genuine sword? I suppose my only hope is that this 'sword' could be several 'cobbled' together ....all those years ago......and hopefully not to create a 'wallhanger'.......Ah hope springs eternal ...... will have to wait and see. I also suspect that it has some monetary value as a 'Victorian curio', if anyone has any idea of it's worth (as a curio) please PM me thankyou.