![]() |
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
Well, it surprises me that anybody brought it up yet, but i have a similar example in my collection wich was discussed here some time ago.
It is definetly a weapon of the same type, but lacking in decoration. and it is definetly an old flyssa! Ham, the pictures above could be deciving. The determinant factor is the tang.Yataghans have a full and wide tang, wich flyssas have not. Look at the notch on the backedge, another typical flyssa sign. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ghlight=flyssa Manolo, have you got it? I saw it too, but forgot to bid (as usually) , NICE ONE!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|