![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
It would be a shame to etch it IMHO......
The notch on the back before the false edge is interesting...is it there to relieve stress and shock to the blade ? Or has it another function? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,461
|
![]()
Puullleeese leave it as is!!!!!
![]() Is the back edge of the blade sharpened up to that raised section? Check the discussion on 'Old 1900's Indian sword'...same type feature. Best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
![]()
Is this a flyssa, or a yatagan? It looks more like a Black Sea yatagan to me.
n2s |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,461
|
![]()
JUDL!!!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
![]()
Actually I also thought the same thing - can be a Trabzon short sword, but I don't know much about flyssas, so if you say its flyssa, flyssa it is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
It could be, actually the quality of the blade suggests so, BUT it is not a short sword (84 cm), the hilt is wooden and of totally different design and finally there should be fullers all over it if it were from Black Sea region.
So I still think that it is an archaic form flyssa, lets say around 1800. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,239
|
![]()
also looks like a batak kalasan, except for the hilting & integral bolster - the blade shape seems fairly universal. was there a scabbard with it? that could be diagnostic. (overall looks like an old undecorated flyssa to me)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|