Very old Visayan kris

[Ian]

Xas, thanks for adding these thoughts. There is actually a fourth method that has recently been brought to my attention by another forum member who happens to be an archeologist. This involves carbon dating of the carbon contained within the steel. I believe it involves determining the ratio of C14/C12 content. Unfortunately, this is a destructive analytic method, although only a few grams of metal are required. The obvious place to take a sample would be the tang (if one can get to it).

[xasterix]

Originally Posted by Ian

Xas, thanks for adding these thoughts. There is actually a fourth method that has recently been brought to my attention by another forum member who happens to be an archeologist. This involves carbon dating of the carbon contained within the steel. I believe it involves determining the ratio of C14/C12 content. Unfortunately, this is a destructive analytic method, although only a few grams of metal are required. The obvious place to take a sample would be the tang (if one can get to it).

Thanks for that Ian; that's a relatively foolproof and thoroughly scientific way of looking at it. Did he mention how accurate it would be (can it be narrowed down to years or decades)?

[Ian]

Originally Posted by xasterix

Thanks for that Ian; that's a relatively foolproof and thoroughly scientific way of looking at it. Did he mention how accurate it would be (can it be narrowed down to years or decades)?

Ray, I don't know the precision of the carbon-dating method for steel. However, I did find a nice overview article for the use of carbon dating of iron and steel: HERE

Regards, Ian