![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,277
|
The sword seems to have a mix of colours, the grip is mostly a worn shiny black, especially on the side opposite the faces. Parts of the blade you can see the bronze colour under the start of a shined brownish oxidation, there are ares that look like chrome polish was used to clean it, white residue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,277
|
More photos:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,277
|
More More:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 991
|
The formation of the masks on the hilt is quite different in style and orientation from examples I could find in my limited library. I had thought the very narrow midrib and its termination unlikely, but I found a very similar, though better executed, example on a long dagger in Khorasani's massive tome on Iranian arms. Worrisome that the patina stays the same over areas of the midrib that appear deeply scraped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 471
|
Almost certainly a tourist item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,648
|
Wayne, I'm going to join the chorus of those who think this is a decorative item made well within the last century, and has been "manipulated' to appear older. I won't discuss the features that are "wrong" on this one because those who make these deceptive versions can adapt their methods to overcome flaws in their work. Let's just say the patina and wear with age are unconvincing.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|