Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 1st September 2024, 02:23 PM   #8
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corrado26 View Post
Could it be that the number at the socked is II/SI and not II/8I?
That's what I was thinking too Udo. As I noted in my post (#4) the markings on the British volunteer unit bayonet are remarkably similar. In the late 1790s into early years of 1800s there was a distinct paranoia in England about possible French invasion. There were units of the army and artillery positioned along the coasts, and bolstered by various groups or units of militia.

It would seem possible that this might be markings from such a unit, though only some sort of corroboration from accounts of such units, which are apparently pretty scarce. The presumed numerals 18 seem more like an SI as the '8' character does not close and cross as it should, but remains open like an 'S.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.