![]() |
|
|
#21 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
. I thought that the odds have shown us that the stylized figure is not a '3' but a 'Z', as approached now and a while back .And yes, the foggy pictures provided show no evidence of the discussed mark being that of one of the suggested smiths, also as here approached .
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|