![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
I think they are too early with their dating.
attached a few dated examples: cat no 3 dated 1697 cat no 5 dated 1721 cat no 6 dated 1756 I stay with the 18C dating and target crossbow. from the publication Crossbows in the royal netherlands army museum. best, jasper |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Cat. Nš 3 (pages 100-103), as per my post #4.That was my initial idea
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
Quote:
best, Jasper Last edited by cornelistromp; 29th May 2022 at 09:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 235
|
Thanks Jasper. I know it may seem that I am being argumentative, but for me, it's important to be thorough in exploring as many trails as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
No problem, it is a very good not to take everything indiscriminately. When I got my Target crossbow back in 2000 I had the same discussion with JP Puype, the former curator of the Army Museum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chania Crete Greece
Posts: 512
|
Very interesting thread, thanks! What is the age and origin of this target crossbow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Eftihis, it will be a late model, late 19th. century ?, with that 'complex' shiny trigger guard and the accuracy set (hair) trigger.
But don't trust my judgement .
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|