![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]()
I will check, but overall what is your opinion based on the appearance of the miniature and without being able to see it in person do you think it could be period ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 672
|
![]()
Hello
I would like to see a picture of the inside of the lock. I notice a series of screws on the plate, which do not correspond to the typical construction. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Here is the lock
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Can you also trim the picture of that screw, as to obtain a bigger image of it ?
And by the way... You may find it interesting to keep to your files these notes on VERY EARLY SCREWS ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 46
|
![]()
I have tried cropping the image of the screw however when I do that the file size is too large and it won’t let me change it so I can only change the original photo file size and it’s the largest option
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
If you wish you can send me the original full size photos; i will see what i can do.
fernando@vikingsword.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 672
|
![]()
Hello
It seems to be fully functional, although the pan lid lacks a spring that holds it in place, it has a single catch, when the bigger guys had two, and so the subject of the shot is different. It also differs in the fixing of some parts by forging and riveting., But it is very difficult to establish a manufacturing date, which must be done by comparing it with existing specimens. Affectionately |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|