![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | 
| 
			
			 Vikingsword Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 6,376
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Ariel , just my opinion but I think this can be quite a subjective question . 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	In the case of the krisses under discussion I'm led to ask myself "What would the original owner do ?" ; in most cases I think that if the sword in its native environment was damaged to the point of the ivory pommel piece in question that either a repair , replacement or modification would be done . I would also think the same would apply to the kris without a pommel . Now this may be unique to the world of keris and kris ; but the heart and soul of these weapons is the blade regardless of Indo/Malay or Moro origin . In these cultures dress was and is replaced regularly as it aged or was damaged ; not to do so was considered disrespectful to the keris/kris itself . Often hilts would be removed and sold if the owner hit hard times ; then a less expensive hilt would be used . Now when these pieces wind up in Western hands *in my opinion* providing a quality repair or replacement can be done if it is in keeping with the culture . When it comes down to it the blade is the heart and soul of the keris/kris and is deserving of honor regardless of the culture it winds up in .  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |