![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,056
|
![]()
Jean, with the utmost respect I would like to make the point that you are thinking and writing as a collector who is using a perspective that I was taught had very little value in the appraisal of the keris.
This Forum is an English language Forum, and the values and attitudes of the contributors to discussion here are firmly based in the collecting traditions of Western European culture. I believe that you are aware that I take only passing interest in keris that originate from outside the Jawa-Bali nexus, I have solid reasons for this rather focused approach and because I do not wish to offend anybody, and I would like to continue to participate in discussion in this Forum, I will reserve my response to the points that you have made. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
There was another Keris auctioned last week, with some corresponding features - generally the same style sheath, talismanic inlays on Gonjo of similar kind.
A Yaksha/Rakshasa hilt with some unusual/individual features. The interesting thing about it - it was brought to England by James Alms (1728 - 1791), officer of the Royal Navy, possibly at latest 1784. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
Referring to the initial post of that nice Palembang kris I noticed the adapted slot opening. Seems to have contained quite a square model.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,295
|
![]()
That is just an inlay, about 4 mm thick. Under it the wrongko exactly fits Gandhik.
Similar inlay, of the same thickness, missing on Kepet side. Just a cosmetic repair, done long time ago. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|