What a history

[estcrh]

Looks like there was originally gold on top of the copper.

[ALEX]

Originally Posted by estcrh

Looks like there was originally gold on top of the copper.

Nice close-up. Looks like it was gilded copper kundan. The exposed carving on the ridge looks clean, even and uniform, almost as machine made., does not look 19thC work.

[mariusgmioc]

I find it strange that the stones don't appear to be gems but coloured glass. But the photos can be deceiving.

[estcrh]

Originally Posted by mariusgmioc

I find it strange that the stones don't appear to be gems but coloured glass. But the photos can be deceiving.

You are probably right, maybe gems and gold were removed, with the gems being replaced. But the blade does not appear to be of the quality expected as well in my opinion.

[mariusgmioc]

Originally Posted by estcrh

You are probably right, maybe gems and gold were removed, with the gems being replaced. But the blade does not appear to be of the quality expected as well in my opinion.

I was thinking pretty much the same albeit the quality of the photos make the assesment of the blade very difficult.

All in all, this dagger and its story raise more question marks than the pyramids...

[ariel]

Long, long ago somebody on this Forum said: " Buy the sword, not the story".

I still remember it.

[Rick]

Here's an echo.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...+not+the+story

[mariusgmioc]

Originally Posted by ariel

Long, long ago somebody on this Forum said: " Buy the sword, not the story".

I still remember it.

So much true! Yet, very often people prefer to buy the story.

@ Rick

Didn't see this thread. Made me smile! Reminded me Alan's story about the "flying keris."